4.3 Article

Tattoo-Free Setup for Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Regional Nodal Irradiation

Journal

PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages e20-e27

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.08.001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the accuracy and treatment time of using conventional tattoos versus not using tattoos for setup alignment in patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer. The results showed that using a combination of surface and X-ray imaging without tattoos can achieve excellent alignment accuracy with reduced treatment time, eliminating the need for skin-based tattoos for these patients.
Purpose: Patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) with either 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) plan-ning or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) receive permanent tattoos to assist with daily setup alignment and verification. With the advent of surface imaging, tattoos may not be necessary to ensure setup accuracy. We compared the accuracy of conventional tattoo-based setups to those without reference to tattoos.Methods and Materials: Forty-eight patients receiving RNI at our institution from July 2019 to December 2020 were identified. All patients received tattoos per standard of care. Twenty-four patients underwent setup using tattoos for initial positioning followed by surface and x-ray imaging. A subsequent 24 patients underwent positioning using surface imaging followed by x-ray imaging without reference to tattoos. Patient cohorts were balanced by treatment technique and use of deep inspiration breath hold. Treatment (includ-ing setup and delivery) time and x-ray-based shifts after surface imaging were recorded.Results: Among patients in the tattoo group receiving 3DCRT RNI, the average treatment time per fraction was 21.35 versus 19.75 minutes in the 3DCRT RNI no-tattoo cohort (P = .03). Mean 3D vector shifts for patients in the tattoo cohort were 5.6 versus 4.4 mm in the no-tattoo cohort. The average treatment time per fraction for the tattoo VMAT RNI cohort was 23.16 versus 20.82 minutes in the no -tattoo VMAT RNI cohort (P = .08). Mean 3D vector shifts for the patients in the tattoo VMAT cohort were 5.5 versus 7.1 mm in the no -tattoo VMAT cohort. Breath hold technique and body mass index did not affect accuracy in a consistent or clinically relevant way.Conclusions: Using a combination of surface and x-ray imaging, without reference to tattoos, provides excellent accuracy in alignment and setup verification among patients receiving RNI for breast cancer, regardless of treatment technique and with reduced treatment time. Skin-based tattoos are no longer warranted for patients receiving supine RNI.(c) 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available