4.6 Review

Azithromycin through the Lens of the COVID-19 Treatment

Journal

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11081063

Keywords

macrolides; azithromycin; virus; coronavirus; COVID-19; immunolides; antivirus

Funding

  1. Research Committee of the University of Patras
  2. Hellenic State Scholarships Foundation (IKy) through the Operational Program Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning
  3. European Union (European Social Fund, ESF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review evaluates the potential of azithromycin as a therapeutic agent for COVID-19 infection and discusses its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral activity. The findings suggest that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the use of azithromycin as a treatment for COVID-19, and discontinuing its use could prevent antibiotic resistance and preserve its value as an effective anti-infective therapeutic agent.
Azithromycin has become famous in the last two years, not for its main antimicrobial effect, but for its potential use as a therapeutic agent for COVID-19 infection. Initially, there were some promising results that supported its use, but it has become clear that scientific results are insufficient to support such a positive assessment. In this review we will present all the literature data concerning the activity of azithromycin as an antimicrobial, an anti-inflammatory, or an antivirus agent. Our aim is to conclude whether its selection should remain as a valuable antivirus agent or if its use simply has an indirect therapeutic contribution due to its antimicrobial and/or immunomodulatory activity, and therefore, if its further use for COVID-19 treatment should be interrupted. This halt will prevent further antibiotic resistance expansion and will keep azithromycin as a valuable anti-infective therapeutic agent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available