4.7 Review

Current Trends in the Production of Probiotic Formulations

Journal

FOODS
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11152330

Keywords

lactic acid bacteria; spray drying; freeze drying; vacuum drying; fluid bed drying; viability; shelf-life; stress factors; protectants

Funding

  1. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [005/RID/2018/19]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares different drying methods for probiotic formulations, discusses factors affecting the quality and stability of such formulations, and proposes countermeasures to address these challenges. It also explores the latest trends and developments in drying technologies and probiotic production.
Preparations containing probiotic strains of bacteria have a beneficial effect on human and animal health. The benefits of probiotics translate into an increased interest in techniques for the preservation of microorganisms. This review compares different drying methods and their improvements, with specific reference to processing conditions, microorganisms, and protective substances. It also highlights some factors that may influence the quality and stability of the final probiotic preparations, including thermal, osmotic, oxidative, and acidic stresses, as well as dehydration and shear forces. Processing and storage result in the loss of viability and stability in probiotic formulations. Herein, the addition of protective substances, the optimization of process parameters, and the adaptation of cells to stress factors before drying are described as countermeasures to these challenges. The latest trends and developments in the fields of drying technologies and probiotic production are also discussed. These developments include novel application methods, controlled release, the use of food matrices, and the use of analytical methods to determine the viability of probiotic bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available