4.7 Article

Nutrient-Loading Mitigation by Shellfish Aquaculture in Semi-Enclosed Estuaries

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.909926

Keywords

eutrophication; nutrient loading; shellfish aquaculture; ecosystem services; estuary model; climate change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bivalve aquaculture can help mitigate eutrophication by extracting nitrogen from estuaries. However, its effectiveness depends on various factors such as bivalve species, bay geomorphology, and climate change. Mussels are more effective than oysters in nutrient mitigation, and open systems are more resilient to change than closed ones. The study also found that increasing bivalve biomass increases nutrient mitigation potential.
Bivalve aquaculture may provide a variety of ecosystem services including nitrogen extraction from estuaries, which are often subject to excess nutrient loading from various land activities, causing eutrophication. This nitrogen extraction may be affected by a combination of various non-linear interactions between the cultured organisms and the receiving ecosystem. The present study used a coupled hydro-biogeochemical model to examine the interactive effects of various factors on the degree of estuarine nutrient mitigation by farmed bivalves. These factors included bay geomorphology (leaky, restricted and choked systems), river size (small and large rivers leading to moderate (105.9 Mt N yr(-1)) and high (529.6 Mt N yr(-1)) nutrient discharges), bivalve species (blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) and eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica)), farmed bivalve area (0, 10, 25 and 40% of estuarine surface area) and climate change (water temperature, sea level and precipitation reflecting either present or future (Horizon 2050) conditions). Model outputs indicated that bivalve culture was associated with the retention of nitrogen within estuaries, but that this alteration of nitrogen exchange between estuaries and the open ocean was not uniform across all tested variables and it depended on the nature of their interaction with the bivalves as well as their own dynamics. When nitrogen extraction resulting from harvest was factored in, however, bivalve culture was shown to provide a net nitrogen removal in the majority of the tested model scenarios. Mussels provided more nutrient mitigation than oysters, open systems were more resilient to change than closed ones, and mitigation potential was shown to generally increase with increasing bivalve biomass. Under projected future temperature conditions, nutrient mitigation from mussel farms was predicted to increase, while interactions with the oyster reproductive cycle led to both reduced harvested biomass and nutrient mitigation potential. This study presents the first quantification of the effects of various biological, physical, geomorphological and hydrodynamical processes on nutrient mitigation by bivalve aquaculture and will be critical in addressing questions related to eutrophication mitigation by bivalves and prediction of possible nutrient trading credits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available