4.6 Review

A systematic review protocol for assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.815660

Keywords

clinical practice guideline; traumatic brain injury; concussion; homeless; health inequity; evidence-based practice; knowledge synthesis; disadvantaged populations

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chairs Program
  2. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ministry [725A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This protocol outlines a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and homelessness. The review aims to assess the integration of evidence on TBI and homelessness in CPGs and evaluate the equity considerations within these guidelines. The review will use validated search filters and methodology guides to identify CPGs from various sources and will involve independent screening, synthesis, and quality appraisal by two reviewers.
Background: When used optimally, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce inappropriate variations in practice, improve application of research to practice, and enhance the quality of healthcare. However, a common criticism, despite its potential, is the lack of consideration for equity and disadvantaged populations. Objectives: This protocol is for a systematic review of CPGs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and homelessness that aims to assess (1) the extent to which evidence regarding TBI and homelessness is integrated in CPGs for homelessness and TBI, respectively, and (2) equity considerations in CPGs for TBI and homelessness. Methods and analysis: The methodology for this review is guided by the PRISMA-P, validated search filters for CPGs, and methodological guides to searching systematic reviews and gray literature. CPGs will be identified from (a) databases for peer-reviewed literature (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo), (b) targeted websites and Google Search for gray literature, and (c) reference lists of peer-reviewed and gray literature that meet the eligibility criteria. Searching for gray literature, including from guideline-specific resources, is a critical component of this review and is considered an efficient approach to identifying CPGs, given the low precision of searching peer-reviewed databases. Two independent reviewers will screen all articles based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. A narrative synthesis will be conducted to identify the proportion of CPGs that integrate evidence about TBI and homelessness and how TBI and homelessness is or is not integrated in CPGs. Quality appraisal will take the form of an equity assessment of CPGs and will be completed independently by two reviewers. Conclusion: This protocol outlines the methodology for a systematic review of CPGs for TBI and homelessness. The resulting systematic review from this protocol will form an evidence-based foundation to advance CPGs for individuals with lived experience of TBI and homelessness.Systematic review registrationidentifier: CRD42021287696.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available