4.6 Review

OOP-ESEEM Spectroscopy: Accuracies of Distances of Spin-Correlated Radical Pairs in Biomolecules

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.890826

Keywords

EPR spectroscopy; coupled radical pair; distance determination; dipolar coupling; OOP-ESEEM

Funding

  1. DFG [235777276/GRK1976]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the potential of out-of-phase-electron-spin echo envelope modulation (OOP-ESEEM) spectroscopy in collecting accurate distance information in photo-sensitive (bio) molecules. The OOP-ESEEM time traces were simulated and analyzed to obtain excellent agreement between calculated and numerically fitted values over a wide range of distances.
In addition to the commonly used electron-electron double resonance (ELDOR) technique, there are several other electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) methods by which structure information can be obtained by exploiting the dipolar coupling between two radicals based on its characteristic r(-3) dependence. In this contribution, we explore the potential of out-of-phase-electron-spin echo envelope modulation (OOP-ESEEM) spectroscopy to collect accurate distance information in photo-sensitive (bio) molecules. Although the method has already been applied to spin-correlated radical pairs in several classes of light-active proteins, the accuracy of the information obtained has not yet been extensively evaluated. To do this in a system-independent fashion, OOP-ESEEM time traces simulated with different values of the dipolar and exchange couplings were generated and analyzed in a best-possible way. Excellent agreement between calculated and numerically fitted values over a wide range of distances (between 15 and 45 angstrom) was obtained. Furthermore, the limitations of the method and the dependence on various experimental parameters could be evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available