4.3 Article

Assessment of Strategic Healthcare Purchasing Arrangements and Functions Towards Universal Coverage in Tanzania

Publisher

KERMAN UNIV MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6234

Keywords

Strategic Purchasing; Selective Contracting; Provider Payment; Benefits Entitlements; Tanzania

Funding

  1. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation through the Strategic Purchasing Africa Resource Center (SPARC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strategic health purchasing in low and middle-income countries is crucial for achieving universal health coverage. This study in Tanzania analyzed three purchasing arrangements, highlighting the importance of compliance with contractual agreements and investment in monitoring systems for efficient delivery of quality healthcare services and tracking population health outcomes.
Background: Strategic health purchasing in low and middle-income countries has received substantial attention as countries aim to achieve universal health coverage, by ensuring equitable access to quality health services without the risk of financial hardship. There is little evidence published from Tanzania on purchasing arrangements and what is required for strategic purchasing. This study analyses three purchasing arrangements in Tanzania and gives recommendations to strengthen strategic purchasing in Tanzania. Methods: We used the multi-case qualitative study drawing on the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF), Social Health Insurance Benefit (SHIB), and improved Community Health Fund (iCHF) to explore the three purchasing arrangements with a purchaser-provider split. Data were drawn from document reviews and results were validated with nine key informant interviews with a range of actors involved in strategic purchasing. A deductive and inductive approach was used to develop the themes and framework analysis to summarize the data. Results: The findings show that benefit selection for all three schemes was based on the standard treatment guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health. Selection-contracting of the private healthcare providers are based on the location of the provider, the range of services available as stipulated in the scheme guideline, and the willingness of the provider to be contracted. NHF uses fee-for-service to reimburse providers. While SHIB and iCHF use capitation. NHIF has an electronic system to monitor registration, verification, claims processing, and referrals. While SHIB monitoring is done through routine supportive supervision and for the iCHF provider performance is monitored through utilization rates. Conclusion: Enforcing compliance with the contractual agreement between providers purchasers is crucial for the provision of quality services in an efficient manner. Investment in a routine monitoring system, such as the use of the district health information system which allows effective tracking of healthcare service delivery, and broader population healthcare outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available