4.7 Review

Regulation of Neural Circuitry under General Anesthesia: New Methods and Findings

Journal

BIOMOLECULES
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12070898

Keywords

general anesthesia; neural nuclei and circuits; in vivo calcium imaging; chemogenetics; optogenetics

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 82072150]
  2. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [20JCQNJC01050]
  3. Natural Science Fund of the Scientific Research Plan Project of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission [2019KJ201]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reviews the neural nuclei and pathways affected by general anesthesia, and introduces the applications of three advanced technologies, in vivo calcium imaging, chemogenetics, and optogenetics. It provides a reference for further research on other neural circuits under general anesthesia and contributes to other research fields in the future.
General anesthesia has been widely utilized since the 1840s, but its underlying neural circuits remain to be completely understood. Since both general anesthesia and sleep are reversible losses of consciousness, studies on the neural-circuit mechanisms affected by general anesthesia have mainly focused on the neural nuclei or the pathways known to regulate sleep. Three advanced technologies commonly used in neuroscience, in vivo calcium imaging, chemogenetics, and optogenetics, are used to record and modulate the activity of specific neurons or neural circuits in the brain areas of interest. Recently, they have successfully been used to study the neural nuclei and pathways of general anesthesia. This article reviews these three techniques and their applications in the brain nuclei or pathways affected by general anesthesia, to serve as a reference for further and more accurate exploration of other neural circuits under general anesthesia and to contribute to other research fields in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available