4.7 Article

CRISPR/Cas12a Coupled With Recombinase Polymerase Amplification for Sensitive and Specific Detection of Aphelenchoides besseyi

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.912959

Keywords

CRISPR; Cas12a; RPA; Aphelenchoides besseyi; rice; molecular identification; detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes a novel detection assay combining RPA and CRISPR/Cas12a for the rapid and accurate detection of A. besseyi, the causal agent of rice white tip disease. The assay is highly specific and sensitive, requires no sophisticated equipment, and shows promise for on-site surveillance.
Aphelenchoides besseyi (A. besseyi), a seed-borne parasitic nematode, is the causal agent of rice white tip disease (RWTD), which may result in a drastic loss of rice yield. Seed treatments are currently considered to be the most effective means of preventing the spread of RWTD. Therefore, the rapid, highly specific, and accurate detection of A. besseyi from rice seeds is crucial for the surveillance, prevention, and control of RWTD. Here, we describe a novel detection assay that combines recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR/Cas12a to detect A. besseyi (termed RPA-Cas12a-Ab), with a low limit of detection (LOD) of 1 copy/mu l of plasmid or 1:10(7) diluted DNA extracted from individual nematodes. To improve the user-friendliness, lateral flow strip assay (LFA) was adopted to visualize the detection result. The LOD of the RPA-Cas12a-Ab LFA assay was 1,000 copies/mu l plasmid or 1:10 diluted DNA extracted from individual nematodes. The assay developed in this study was able to identify A. besseyi in 45 min with high accuracy and sensitivity without cross reaction with three closely related non-A. besseyi species. Thus, RPA-Cas12a-Ab is a rapid, sensitive, and specific detection system that requires no sophisticated equipment and shows promise for on-site surveillance of A. besseyi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available