4.7 Review

Hydrogels in Spinal Cord Injury Repair: A Review

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.931800

Keywords

spinal cord injury; hydrogel; cells; molecular; repair; review

Funding

  1. Department of science and technology of Jilin Province [20190304028YY]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traffic accidents and falling objects are the main causes of spinal cord injuries (SCIs), seriously affecting the lives and quality of life of patients. Hydrogels, with their biocompatibility and adjustability, serve as structural scaffolds and slow-release carriers in neural tissue engineering, promoting tissue repair. This review discusses the characteristics and advantages of hydrogels as delivery vehicles in SCI therapy and explores their prospects in clinical research for the treatment of SCI.
Traffic accidents and falling objects are responsible for most spinal cord injuries (SCIs). SCI is characterized by high disability and tends to occur among the young, seriously affecting patients' lives and quality of life. The key aims of repairing SCI include preventing secondary nerve injury, inhibiting glial scarring and inflammatory response, and promoting nerve regeneration. Hydrogels have good biocompatibility and degradability, low immunogenicity, and easy-to-adjust mechanical properties. While providing structural scaffolds for tissues, hydrogels can also be used as slow-release carriers in neural tissue engineering to promote cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, as well as accelerate the repair of damaged tissue. This review discusses the characteristics of hydrogels and their advantages as delivery vehicles, as well as expounds on the progress made in hydrogel therapy (alone or combined with cells and molecules) to repair SCI. In addition, we discuss the prospects of hydrogels in clinical research and provide new ideas for the treatment of SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available