4.7 Article

Connexin Mutants Cause Cataracts Through Deposition of Apatite

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.951231

Keywords

cataracts; mineralization; calcification; computed tomography; connexin; Fourier transform IR; gap junction channel; lens

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cataracts, a common cause of blindness, are believed to develop from accumulation of damage to lens proteins. However, recent evidence suggests that calcium ion accumulation and precipitation of calcium-containing salts may also lead to cataracts. Studies on mutant mice with cataracts caused by connexin46 and connexin50 mutations found the presence of radio-dense minerals in the mutant lenses, suggesting a pathological mineralization process.
Cataracts are lens opacities that are among the most common causes of blindness. It is commonly believed that cataracts develop through the accumulation of damage to lens proteins. However, recent evidence suggests that cataracts can result from calcium ion accumulation and the precipitation of calcium-containing salts. To test for the presence of precipitates and to identify their components, we studied the lenses of mice that develop cataracts due to mutations of connexin46 and connexin50. Micro-computed tomography showed the presence of radio-dense mineral in the mutant lenses, but not in wild-type lenses. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the scans showed that the distribution of the radio-dense mineral closely paralleled the location and morphology of the cataracts. The mutant lens homogenates also contained insoluble particles that stained with Alizarin red (a dye that stains Ca2+ deposits). Using attenuated total internal reflection micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, we identified the mineral as calcium phosphate in the form of apatite. Taken together, these data support the novel paradigm that cataracts are formed through pathological mineralization within the lens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available