4.7 Article

CD8 T cells contribute to vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in macaques

Journal

SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 77, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abq7647

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID [75N93021C00014]
  2. Massachusetts Consortium for Pathogen Readiness
  3. Ragon Institute
  4. Musk Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that vaccine-elicited CD8+ T cells contribute substantially to virologic control after SARS-CoV-2 challenge in macaques.
Spike-specific neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are generally considered key correlates of vaccine protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Recently, robust vaccine prevention of severe disease with SARS-CoV-2 variants that largely escape NAb responses has been reported, suggesting a role for other immune parameters for virologic control. However, direct data demonstrating a role of CD8+ T cells in vaccine protection have not yet been reported. In this study, we show that vaccine-elicited CD8+ T cells contribute substantially to virologic control after SARS-CoV-2 challenge in rhesus macaques. We vaccinated 30 macaques with a single immunization of the adenovirus vector-based vaccine Ad26.COV2.S or sham and then challenged them with 5 x 10(5) median tissue culture infectious dose SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) by the intranasal and intratracheal routes. All vaccinated animalswere infected by this high-dose challenge but showed rapid virologic control in nasal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage by day 4 after challenge. However, administration of an anti-CD8a- or anti-CD8 ss-depleting monoclonal antibody in vaccinated animals before SARS-CoV-2 challenge resulted in higher levels of peak and day 4 virus in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts. These data demonstrate that CD8(+) T cells contribute substantially to vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 replication in macaques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available