Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Young infants process prediction errors at the theta rhythm
Moritz Koester et al.
NEUROIMAGE (2021)
Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning
Andrew W. Senior et al.
NATURE (2020)
Building machines that learn and think like people
Brenden M. Lake et al.
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2017)
Real-world visual statistics and infants' first-learned object names
Elizabeth M. Clerkin et al.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2017)
A Developmental Approach to Machine Learning?
Linda B. Smith et al.
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2017)
Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition
Martin V. Butz
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2016)
What's the object of object working memory in infancy? Unraveling 'what' and 'how many'
Melissa M. Kibbe et al.
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2013)
Intuitive physical reasoning about occluded objects by inexperienced chicks
Cinzia Chiandetti et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2011)
Pure Reasoning in 12-Month-Old Infants as Probabilistic Inference
Erno Teglas et al.
SCIENCE (2011)
Can infants be “taught” to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events
Su-hua Wang et al.
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (2008)
Innate Ideas Revisited For a Principle of Persistence in Infants' Physical Reasoning
Renee Baillargeon
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2008)
Core knowledge
Elizabeth S. Spelke et al.
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE (2007)
The neural mechanisms of object working memory:: what is where in the infant brain?
Z Káldy et al.
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS (2004)
Infants' reasoning about hidden objects: evidence for event-general and event-specific expectations
R Baillargeon
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE (2004)
Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy
SJ Hespos et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2001)