4.6 Review

Ultra-processed foods and human health: from epidemiological evidence to mechanistic insights

Journal

LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 1128-1140

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00169-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [ERC-2018-StG-804135]
  2. IdEx Universite de Paris [ANR-18-IDEX-0001]
  3. Kenneth Rainin Foundation
  4. ANR grant EMULBIONT [ANR-21-CE15-0042-01]
  5. national programme Microbiote from INSERM
  6. French Foundation for Medical Research (Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale, Programme generaliste, Espoirs de la recherche) [SPF202.110.013914]
  7. ERC [864219]
  8. French National Cancer Institute [INCa_14059]
  9. French Ministry of Health
  10. ADDITIVES project
  11. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-21-CE15-0042] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [864219] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides an overview of the current data that highlight the association between ultra-processed food consumption and various chronic diseases, with a focus on epidemiological evidence and mechanistic insights involving the intestinal microbiota.
Epidemiological studies have suggested a role for ultra-processed foods in numerous chronic inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel diseases and metabolic syndrome. Preclinical and clinical studies are accumulating to better decipher the effects of various aspects of food processing and formulation on the aetiology of chronic, debilitating inflammatory diseases. In this Review, we provide an overview of the current data that highlight an association between ultra-processed food consumption and various chronic diseases, with a focus on epidemiological evidence and mechanistic insights involving the intestinal microbiota.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available