4.5 Article

Effect of the particle blending-shaping method and silicon carbide crystal phase for Mn-Na-W/SiO2-SiC catalyst in oxidative coupling of methane

Journal

MOLECULAR CATALYSIS
Volume 527, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112399

Keywords

oxidative coupling of methane; silicon carbide; spray-drying; mechanochemical synthesis; support effects

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the effect of the support on the catalyst for the oxidative coupling of methane. The study shows that catalysts prepared using the spray-drying method exhibit promising selective catalytic performance. Additionally, the catalyst with the α+β SiC crystal phase demonstrates significantly higher activity compared to the β phase. The most promising catalyst is prepared using the spray-drying method and contains the α+β SiC crystal phase.
Supported Mn-Na-W on silica is a benchmark catalyst for oxidative coupling of methane due to its appropriate ethylene yields. Here we compare eight catalysts with the same active phase (Mn-Na-W) and variable support composition or particle blending-shaping method to evaluate the effect of the support. First, we explore the different preparation methods (impregnation, ball milling, and spray-drying), concluding that spray-drying leads to a promising selective catalyst. Then, we compare different SiC crystal phases (alpha+beta and beta), keeping the same composition and shaping method (spray-drying). The catalyst with alpha+beta SiC crystal phase has significantly more activity than the beta one in 30 h reaction runs. Finally, we assess the effect of process conditions to improve the yields (15 % at 800?C) of the most promising catalyst: spray-dried and with alpha+beta SiC. The roles of the blending shaping method and SiC crystal phase are explained by the induced differences in oxidation behavior and active phase distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available