4.7 Article

Recalcitrant C Source Mapping Utilizing Solely Terrain-Related Attributes and Data Mining Techniques

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12071653

Keywords

digital soil mapping; environmental covariates; glomalin; modeling; organic carbon; random forest

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2014-04100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the impact of agricultural practices on the spatial distribution of glomalin in soil using digital soil mapping. The findings showed that the random forests model outperformed other predictive models in predicting and mapping the distribution of glomalin.
Agricultural practices affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) hyphae growth and glomalin production, which is a recalcitrant carbon (C) source in soil. Since the spatial distribution of glomalin is an interesting issue for agronomists in terms of carbon sequestration, digital maps are a cost-free and useful approach. For this study, a set of 120 soil samples was collected from an experimental area of 310 km(2) from the Sarab region of Iran. Soil total glomalin (TG) and easily extractable glomalin (EEG) were determined via ELISA using the monoclonal antibody 32B11. Soil organic carbon (OC) was also measured. The ratios of TG/OC and EEG/OC as the glomalin-C quotes of OC were calculated. A total of 17 terrain-related attributes were also derived from the digital elevation model (DEM) and used as static environmental covariates in digital soil mapping (DSM) using three predictive models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), random forests (RF), and Cubist (CU). The major findings were as follows: (a) DSM facilitated the interpretation of recalcitrant C source variation; (b) RF outperformed MLR and CU as models in predicting and mapping the spatial distribution of glomalin using available covariates; (c) the best accuracy in predictions was for EEG, followed by EEG/OC, TG, and TG/OC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available