4.7 Review

Effects of Agri-Environment Schemes in Terms of the Results for Soil, Water and Soil Organic Matter in Central and Eastern Europe

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12071585

Keywords

soil; water; arable farming; grasslands; ecosystem services; carbon storage

Funding

  1. European Union [862695]
  2. Ministry of Education (MSMT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article focuses on the role and use of agri-environment measures in Central and Eastern Europe in providing ecosystem services. It discusses the importance of soil conservation and examines the implementation of agri-environment schemes in arable land systems. The study found that while subsidies for agri-environment measures have increased moderately over time, they are still overshadowed by generic farm-level subsidies.
Building on the agri-environment framework in Central and Eastern Europe, the article emphasizes the role and the use of the agri-environment in provision of different ecosystem services. It shows that relevant conservation measures with regard to ameliorating soil degradation contribute to the existence of sustainable land systems. In our study, we (i) identified what the soil water aggregate means, (ii) reviewed how agri-environment schemes (AES) function to support soil water requirements, and (iii) how appropriate soils are identified with regard to the implementation of soil conservation under the agri-environment. Empirical data were surveyed to assess AES as the pivotal subsidy in four countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Quantitative data were assessed to contribute to evidence on and the expenditure effect of the measures. This review found that AES schemes in arable land systems implement several approaches such as cover crops and the reversion of arable land systems to grassland. The costs of AE measures reflect the costs of the particular agri-environmental practice and its constraints on commercial performance by the farmer. The AES budget analysis showed that subsidization moderately increased over the 2000-2020 time frame. However, the magnitude of the AES budget is still largely overshadowed by generic subsidies at farm level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available