4.4 Article

Pulp revascularization on an adult mandibular right second premolar: A case report

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 10, Issue 17, Pages 5833-5840

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5833

Keywords

Pulp revascularization; Chronic periapical periodontitis; Immature roots; Open apices; Abnormal central tip; Case report

Funding

  1. General Program of National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81870755]
  2. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [PY2020018]
  3. Science Research Cultivation Program of Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University [A2022199, PY2021021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulp revascularization showed favorable results in treating adult patients with chronic periapical periodontitis with immature roots and open apices.
BACKGROUND Pulp revascularization has become a new method for the treatment of periapical diseases in young permanent teeth in recent years. Through root canal flushing and disinfection, avoiding mechanical preparation, guiding apical stem cells into the root canal and promoting the continuous development of tooth roots, it has achieved good clinical curative effects. But in adult patients with chronic periapical periodontitis with immature roots and open apices, apical barrier technology is often used to treat these teeth. CASE SUMMARY Pulp revascularization of a 26-year-old patient's tooth was performed using cefaclor instead of minocycline and iRoot BP instead of mineral trioxide aggregate as intracanal medication. The case was followed up for 36 mo. Observations showed evidence of regression of clinical signs and symptoms, resolution of apical periodontitis and no discolouration of affected teeth. CONCLUSION For adult patients with chronic periapical periodontitis with immature roots and open apices, pulp revascularisation showed favourable results in treating these teeth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available