4.6 Article

Thermal Stability Evaluation of T152 Emulsifier on the Modification Influence of Fireworks Propellant

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr10081606

Keywords

thermal hazard; TG-FTIR; emulsified propellant; fireworks

Funding

  1. National Key Research Development Program of China [2021YFC3001203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21927815]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [21KJB620003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the use of emulsifier T152 to enhance the thermal stability of propellant in fireworks. The study confirms that the emulsifier T152 can improve the thermal stability of the propellant. This research is of great significance for the fireworks industry as it helps reduce potential safety risks.
High-energy substances like effect propellant and propellant are used in fireworks. In the process of manufacture, transportation, and use, heat can easily get out of control. The emulsifier polyisobutene succinimide (T152) is frequently used to emulsify explosives. Given the thermal safety of the propellant in fireworks, this paper used the emulsifier T152 to emulsify the propellant. Thermogravimetric Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry and differential scanning calorimetry were used to analyze and test the propellant. In addition, several methods of thermokinetic calculation were used to calculate thermal stability. The thermal stability of the propellant before and after adding T152 was compared and analyzed. The test results indicate that the apparent activation energy of the propellant increases with the addition of T152. The emulsifier improved the thermal stability of the propellant. The research results can provide relevant data and suggestions for the thermal reaction of pyrotechnic propellants, thereby reducing the potential risks of the fireworks industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available