4.7 Article

Sequential Value of Information for Subsurface Exploration Drilling

Journal

NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 2413-2434

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-022-10078-z

Keywords

Subsurface exploration; Value of information; Sequential information gathering; Optimal drill placement; Decision-making under uncertainty

Funding

  1. TomKat Center for Sustainable Energy
  2. Stanford Center for Earth Resources Forecasting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative methods are essential for decision-making in subsurface resource exploration, but few methods incorporate the interaction of geological, operational, and financial conditions. This study uses value of information (VOI) to determine the optimal sequence and placement of exploration boreholes and demonstrates the changes in optimal placement and selection based on different drilling strategies.
Quantitative methods are needed for systematic decision-making during exploration for subsurface resources, but few methods exist that fully incorporate the interaction of geological, operational, and financial conditions. The sequential nature of planning where to drill for subsurface exploration is not commonly addressed by conventional techniques in a quantitative fashion, despite its foundational relevance to hypothesis testing. Value of information (VOI) can incorporate various aspects of subsurface exploration decision-making as well as sequence. Here, we use VOI to determine the optimal sequence and placement of exploration boreholes when varying conditions such as target resource volume and drilling cost. Using VOI, we show that the optimal placement and selection of exploration boreholes change when planning to drill one borehole at a time compared to planning to drill two boreholes sequentially. A formulation and tutorial explanation of VOI for sequential decision situations are shown using a synthetic case. We demonstrate a test case using data from a real metal deposit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available