4.6 Article

Clinical comparative study of glasses-free 3D and 2D thoracoscopic surgery in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Oncology

Cancer statistics, 2022

Rebecca L. Siegel et al.

Summary: Each year, the American Cancer Society compiles data on cancer occurrence and outcomes in the United States. The latest data shows that breast and prostate cancer progress has stagnated, while lung cancer has shown improvements in survival rates. Lung cancer incidence for advanced disease has declined while localized-stage rates have increased, resulting in higher survival rates. Mortality patterns align with incidence trends, with lung cancer deaths declining rapidly, breast cancer deaths slowing, and prostate cancer deaths stabilizing.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2022)

Article Surgery

Long-term outcomes after robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Pridvi Kandagatla et al.

Summary: Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted esophagectomy were evaluated in a retrospective review of 112 consecutive patients, showing similar efficacy to non-robotic esophagectomy procedures.

JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY (2022)

Article Surgery

Robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy provides superior surgical resection

Ahmed M. Ali et al.

Summary: While RMIE and tMIE showed no difference in 90-day mortality and readmission rates, RMIE demonstrated better outcomes in terms of positive surgical margins, number of lymph nodes evaluated, and conversion to open rates.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2021)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Worldwide trends in surgical techniques in the treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer

L. Haverkamp et al.

DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS (2017)

Article Surgery

Role of 3D in minimally invasive esophagectomy

Alexandros Charalabopoulos et al.

LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY (2017)

Article Surgery

Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program

Benedetto Mungo et al.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis

Babatunde A. Yerokun et al.

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Short-Term Outcome of Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Benign Pulmonary Diseases

Cheng-Liang Yang et al.

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY (2016)

Article Oncology

Cancer Statistics in China, 2015

Wanqing Chen et al.

CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2016)

Article Surgery

Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy

Pragatheeshwar Thirunavukarasu et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2016)

Article Engineering, Biomedical

Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy?

Mehmet Ozsoy et al.

LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE (2015)

Article Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer

Zhao Li et al.

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY (2015)

Article Surgery

Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Review of Over 1000 Patients

James D. Luketich et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2012)

Article Surgery

Complications of Esophagectomy

Daniel Raymond

SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2012)

Review Surgery

Review of open and minimal access approaches to oesophagectomy for cancer

P. M. Safranek et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY (2010)

Article Surgery

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Lessons Learned From 104 Operations

Ninh T. Nguyen et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2008)