4.6 Article

Trans-Anastomotic Drainage Tube Placement After Hand-Sewn Anastomosis in Patients Undergoing Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: An Alternative Drainage Method

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.872120

Keywords

intersphincteric resection; anastomotic leakage; trans-anastomotic drainage tube; anal function; complication

Categories

Funding

  1. Medical Science and Technology Innovation Platform of Health Commission of Hubei Province/Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University [PTXM2019011]
  2. Clinical Research Special Fund of Wu Jieping Medical Foundation [320.6750.2021-11-8]
  3. Enginerring construction project of improving diagnosis and treatment ability of difficult diseases(oncology) [ZLYNXM202012]
  4. Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University/Hubei Health Commission Joint Fund Project [znpy2019086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a novel drainage technique involving the placement of drainage tubes during handsewn anastomosis to reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after intersphincteric resection. The results showed that the use of trans-anastomotic drainage tubes significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic leakage and did not adversely affect anal function.
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common complication after intersphincteric resection (ISR). It significantly reduces quality of life and causes great distress to patients. Although traditional drainage (e.g., anal and pelvic catheters) may reduce the impact of AL to some extent, their role in reducing the incidence of AL remains controversial. In this study, we developed a novel drainage technique involving the placement of drainage tubes through the gap between sutures during handsewn anastomosis, to reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage. We retrospectively analyzed 34 consecutive patients who underwent intersphincteric resection requiring handsewn anastomosis between February 1, 2017, and January 1, 2021. Patients were classified into the trans-anastomotic drainage tube group (TADT, n = 14) and the non-TADT group (n = 20) based on whether trans-anastomotic tube placement was performed. The incidence of postoperative complications, such as AL, was compared between the two groups, and anal function of patients at 1-year post-ISR was evaluated. Six cases of AL occurred in the non-TADT group, while none occurred in the TADT group; this difference was statistically significant (p=0.031). The TADT group also had a shorter hospital stay (p=0.007). There were no other significant intergroup differences in operation time, blood loss, pain score, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal obstruction, or incidence of wound infection. In the 30 patients (88.2%) evaluated for anal function, there were no significant intergroup differences in stool frequency, urgency, daytime/nocturnal soiling, Wexner incontinence score, or Kirwan grading. Taken together, trans-anastomotic tube placement is a novel drainage method that may reduce AL after ISR requiring handsewn anastomosis and without adversely affecting anal function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available