4.3 Article

Binding and detoxification of chlorpyrifos by lactic acid bacteria on rice straw silage fermentation

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2015.1128744

Keywords

lactic acid bacteria; detoxification; Silage; chlorpyrifos; bind

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Independent Innovation of Agricultural Science and Technology in Jiangsu Province of China [CX (12)1002)]
  2. National Science Foundation of China for Talent Training in Basic Research [J1103507]
  3. Project of Students Training of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, China [201410319021Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This investigation examined the reduction of pesticide residues on straw inoculated with lactic acid bacteria (LAB) during ensiling. Lactobacillus casei WYS3 was isolated from rice straw that contained pesticide residues. Non-sterilized rice straw, which was inoculated with L. casei WYS3, showed increased removal of chlorpyrifos after ensiling, compared with rice straw that was not inoculated with L. casei WYS3 or sterilized rice straw. In pure culture, these strains can bind chlorpyrifos as indicated by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Viable L. casei WYS3 was shown to bind 33.3-42% of exogenously added chlorpyrifos. These results are similar to those of acid-treated cells but less than those of heat-treated cells, which were found to bind 32.0% and 77.2% of the added chlorpyrifos respectively. Furthermore, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis determined that L. casei WYS3 detoxified chlorpyrifos via P-O-C cleavage. Real-time polymerized chain reaction analysis determined that organophosphorus hydrolase gene expression tripled after the addition of chlorpyrifos to LAB cultures, compared with the control group (without chlorpyrifos). This paper highlights the potential use of LAB starter cultures for the detoxification and removal of chlorpyrifos residues in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available