4.7 Article

Reference Values for the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) from General Population Samples in the United Kingdom, Italy, and The Netherlands

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164658

Keywords

traumatic brain injury; post-concussion symptoms; reference values; Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire; patient-reported outcome instruments

Funding

  1. European Union [602150]
  2. Integra LifeSciences Corporation (USA)
  3. Hannelore Kohl Stiftung (Germany)
  4. OneMind (USA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to provide reference values for the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Italy. The study analyzed data from general population samples and compared them with corresponding traumatic brain injury (TBI) samples. The results provide reference values for the total score and three sub-dimensions, which can be used in clinical practice and research.
After traumatic brain injury (TBI), individuals may experience short- or long-term health burdens, often referred to as post-concussion symptoms (PCS). The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) is one of the commonly used instruments to assess self-reported PCS. To date, no reference values for RPQ have been provided, although they are crucial for clinical practice when evaluating a patient's health status relative to a comparable healthy population. Therefore, the aim of this study is to provide reference values for the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Italy. A total of 11,759 individuals (50.3% women) from representative general population samples participated in an online survey (4646 individuals from the UK, 3564 from the Netherlands, and 3549 from Italy). The factorial structure of the RPQ was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and results from the general population samples were compared with those from respective TBI samples recruited within the international CENTER-TBI study using multigroup CFA. Reference values were stratified by sex, health status, age, and education using percentiles. The three-factorial model outperformed the one-factorial structure. The general population samples were largely comparable to the corresponding TBI samples, except for items such as dizziness, vision, and sensory sensitivity, which can be considered more TBI-specific. Because of the significant differences between the general population samples, we provided reference values for the total score and for the somatic, emotional, and cognitive scales for each country separately. The reference values provided can now be used in clinical practice and research. Future studies should obtain stratified reference values for other countries and languages to improve accuracy in the diagnosis and treatment of symptom burden after TBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available