4.7 Article

What Does Bone Corticalization around Dental Implants Mean in Light of Ten Years of Follow-Up?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123545

Keywords

dental implants; long-term results; long-term success; marginal bone loss; functional loading; intraoral radiographs; radiomics; texture analysis; corticalization; bone remodeling

Funding

  1. Medical University of Lodz [503/5-06102/503-51-001-18, 503/5-061-02/503-51-001-17, 503/5-061-02/503-51-002-18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenomenon of peri-implant bone corticalization after functional loading is closely related to marginal bone loss, where an increase in corticalization leads to an increase in bone loss.
The phenomenon of peri-implant bone corticalization after functional loading does not yet have a definite clinical significance and impact on prognosis. An attempt was made to assess the clinical significance of this phenomenon. This prospective study included 554 patients. Standardized intraoral radiographs documenting the jawbone environment of 1556 implants were collected. The follow-up period was 10 years of functional loading. Marginal alveolar bone loss (MBL) and radiographic bone structure (bone index, BI) were evaluated in relation to intraosseous implant design features and prosthetic work performed. After five years, bone structure abnormalities expressed by a reduction of BI to 0.47 +/- 0.21 and MBL = 0.88 +/- 1.27 mm were observed. Both values had an inverse relationship with each other (p < 0.0001). Reference cancellous bone showed BI = 0.85 +/- 0.18. The same relationship was observed after ten years of functional loading: BI = 0.48 +/- 0.21, MBL = 1.49 +/- 1.94 mm, and again an inverse relationship (p < 0.0001). Increasing corticalization (lower BI) is strongly associated with increasing marginal bone loss and increasing corticalization precedes future marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss will increase as corticalization progresses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available