4.7 Article

Development and Validation of a Virtual Reality Simulator for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Training

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144145

Keywords

simulation training; kinematic parameters; virtual reality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The value of kinematic data for skill assessment was investigated using a virtual reality simulator developed for liver surgery. The simulator differentiated between expert surgeons and novices, showing that simulation can be an effective way to obtain kinematic data.
The value of kinematic data for skill assessment is being investigated. This is the first virtual reality simulator developed for liver surgery. This simulator was coded in C++ using PhysX and FleX with a novel cutting algorithm and used a patient data-derived model and two instruments functioning as ultrasonic shears. The simulator was evaluated by nine expert surgeons and nine surgical novices. Each participant performed a simulated metastasectomy after training. Kinematic data were collected for the instrument position. Each participant completed a survey. The expert participants had a mean age of 47 years and 9/9 were certified in surgery. Novices had a mean age of 30 years and 0/9 were certified surgeons. The mean path length (novice 0.76 +/- 0.20 m vs. expert 0.46 +/- 0.16 m, p = 0.008), movements (138 +/- 45 vs. 84 +/- 32, p = 0.043) and time (174 +/- 44 s vs. 102 +/- 42 s, p = 0.004) were significantly different for the two participant groups. There were no significant differences in activating the instrument (107 +/- 25 vs. 109 +/- 53). Participants considered the simulator realistic (6.5/7) (face validity), appropriate for education (5/7) (content validity) with an effective interface (6/7), consistent motion (5/7) and realistic soft tissue behavior (5/7). This study showed that the simulator differentiates between experts and novices. Simulation may be an effective way to obtain kinematic data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available