4.8 Article

A limit on the evolutionary rescue of an Antarctic bacterium from rising temperatures

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 28, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3511

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_172887, PZ00P3_161545, PR00P3_185899]
  2. European Research Council [739874]
  3. University Priority Research Program in Evolutionary Biology at the University of Zurich
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P3_161545, PR00P3_185899] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change can cause extreme heat waves exceeding the upper thermal limit of organisms. A study on Antarctic bacteria found that they can rapidly adapt to higher temperatures through genomic changes that mitigate protein misfolding. However, there is a physiological limit beyond which populations cannot survive.
Climate change is gradual, but it can also cause brief extreme heat waves that can exceed the upper thermal limit of any one organism. To study the evolutionary potential of upper thermal tolerance, we evolved the cold-adapted Antarctic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis to survive at 30 degrees C, beyond its ancestral thermal limit. This high-temperature adaptation occurred rapidly and in multiple populations. It involved genomic changes that occurred in a highly parallel fashion and mitigated the effects of protein misfolding. However, it also confronted a physiological limit, because populations failed to grow beyond 30 degrees C. Our experiments aimed to facilitate evolutionary rescue by using a small organism with large populations living at temperatures several degrees below their upper thermal limit. Larger organisms with smaller populations and living at temperatures closer to their upper thermal tolerances are even more likely to go extinct during extreme heat waves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available