4.4 Article

Radioactive contamination of arthropods from different trophic levels in hilly and mountainous areas after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 104-112

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.017

Keywords

Nuclear power plant accident; Radiocesium; Trophic level; Grasshopper; Cricket; Spider

Funding

  1. East Japan Assistance Project
  2. Ministry of Environment of Japan
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K08134, JP16J10112]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08134, 16J10112] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to understand the influence of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident on the ecosystem in hilly and mountainous areas of Fukushima Prefecture, chronological changes in the levels of radiocesium in arthropod species were investigated. From 2012 to 2014, arthropods from different trophic levels were sampled and the air radiation dose rates at the sampling sites were analyzed, The air radiation dose rates showed a significant and constant reduction over the 2 years at the sampling sites in Fukushima. The median radiocesium concentration (Cs-134 + Cs-137) detected in the rice grasshopper, Oxya yezoensis, and the Emma field cricket, Teleogryllus emma, dropped continuously to 0.080 and 0.078 Bg/g fresh weight, respectively, in 2014. In contrast, no significant reduction in radioactive contamination was observed in the Joro spider, Nephila clavata, in which the level remained at 0.204 Bq/g in 2014. A significant positive correlation between radiocesium concentration and the air radiation dose rate was observed in the rice grasshopper, the Emma field cricket and the Joro spider. The highest correlation coefficient (rho = 0.946) was measured in the grasshopper. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available