4.8 Article

Artificial tactile perception smart finger for material identification based on triboelectric sensing

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq2521

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFB3201200]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [L212010, JQ20038]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971770, T2125003, 61875015, 51902344, 2102231]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021T140041, 2020M680302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research developed a smart finger that is able to accurately identify material type and roughness through the integration of triboelectric sensing and machine learning.
Tactile perception includes the direct response of tactile corpuscles to environmental stimuli and psychological parameters associated with brain recognition. To date, several artificial haptic-based sensing techniques can accurately measure physical stimuli. However, quantifying the psychological parameters of tactile perception to achieve texture and roughness identification remains challenging. Here, we developed a smart finger with surpassed human tactile perception, which enabled accurate identification of material type and roughness through the integration of triboelectric sensing and machine learning. In principle, as each material has different capabilities to gain or lose electrons, a unique triboelectric fingerprint output will be generated when the triboelectric sensor is in contact with the measured object. The construction of a triboelectric sensor array could further eliminate interference from the environment, and the accuracy rate of material identification was as high as 96.8%. The proposed smart finger provides the possibility to impart artificial tactile perception to manipulators or prosthetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available