4.8 Article

Greenhouse gas emissions from African lakes are no longer a blind spot

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi8716

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office [BR/154/A1/HIPE, SD/AR/02A]
  2. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique [2.4.598.07, 2.4.515.11, T.0246.13, J.0009.15, U.N024.17, T.0156.18, J.0013.19, T.0027.20, J.0015.21]
  3. EU [796707]
  4. KU Leuven Special Research Fund
  5. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  6. Fonds Agathon de Potter
  7. Fonds Leopold III pour l'Exploration et la Conservation de la Nature
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [796707] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study collected data on CO2, CH4, and N2O in 24 African lakes and found that CO2 emissions in African lakes and pan-tropical lakes may have been substantially overestimated by a factor of 9-18 and 6-26 respectively.
Natural lakes are thought to be globally important sources of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O) to the atmosphere although nearly no data have been previously reported from Africa. We collected CO2, CH4, and N2O data in 24 African lakes that accounted for 49% of total lacustrine surface area of the African continent and covered a wide range of morphology and productivity. The surface water concentrations of dissolved CO2 were much lower than values attributed in current literature to tropical lakes and lower than in boreal systems because of a higher productivity. In contrast, surface water-dissolved CH4 concentrations were generally higher than in boreal systems. The lowest CO2 and the highest CH4 concentrations were observed in the more shallow and productive lakes. Emissions of CO2 may likely have been substantially overestimated by a factor between 9 and 18 in African lakes and between 6 and 26 in pan-tropical lakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available