4.4 Article

Modelling Deposition and Erosion rates with RadioNuclides (MODERN) - Part 2: A comparison of different models to convert 239+240Pu inventories into soil redistribution rates at unploughed sites

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 97-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.009

Keywords

Soil erosion; Plutonium; Inventory method; Diffusion and migration model; Profile distribution model; Proportional model

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021-146018]
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [20435, D1.50.17]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_146018] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sheeterosion is one of the major threats to alpine soils. To quantify its role and impact in the degradation processes of alpine grasslands, the application of Fallout Radionuclides (FRN) showed very promising results. The specific characteristics of plutonium 239 + 240 (Pu239+240), such as the homogeneous fallout distribution, the long half-life and the cost and time effective measurements make this tracer application for investigating soil degradation in Alpine grasslands more suitable than any other FRN (e.g. Cs-137). However, the conversion of Pu239+240 inventories into soil erosion rates remains a challenge. Currently available conversion models have been developed mainly for Cs-137 with later adaptation to other FRN (e.g. Excess Pb-210, and Be-7), each model being defined for specific land use (ploughed and/or unploughed) and processes (erosion or deposition). As such, they may fail in describing correctly the distribution of Pu isotopes in the soil. A new conversion model, MODERN, with an adaptable algorithm to estimate erosion and deposition rates from any FRN inventory changes was recently proposed (Arata et al., 2016). In this complementary contribution, the authors compare the application of MODERN to other available conversion models. The results show a good agreement between soil redistribution rates obtained from MODERN and from the models currently used by the FRN scientific community (i.e. the Inventory Method). (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.orgilicenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available