4.6 Article

Enhanced Solar-to-Fuel Efficiency of Ceria-Based Thermochemical Cycles via Integrated Electrochemical Oxygen Pumping

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages 2711-2716

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01318

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52006097]
  2. Center for Computational Science and Engineering at Southern University of Science and Technology
  3. Centers for Mechanical Engineering Research and Education at MIT
  4. SUSTech

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solar thermochemical cycle based on ceria is a promising route for renewable fuel production. The integration of a high-temperature electrochemical oxygen pump (EOP) significantly enhances the efficiency and stability of the reactor by minimizing the heating load and enabling effective oxygen pumping.
The solar thermochemical cycle based on ceria is a promising route for renewable fuel production. The solar-to-fuel efficiency of a thermochemical reactor is highly dependent on the oxygen removal during the reduction step. Conventional nitrogen sweeping (NS) requires high heating load and additional gas separation work, which limit the reactor efficiency. We propose the integration of a high-temperature electrochemical oxygen pump (EOP) for in situ oxygen removal to minimize the heating load and to allow for effective oxygen pumping. A transient model was developed to quantify the reactor performance using EOP or NS schemes. The model predicted that the ceria nonstoichiometric coefficient at the end of the reduction was enhanced by 56.8% when using the EOP scheme compared to the NS scheme. Correspondingly, the solar-to-fuel efficiency enhancement factor was 1.64 at reference conditions. In addition, the EOP scheme showed more uniform temperature and species concentration distributions, leading to a more favorable thermo-mechanical stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available