4.7 Article

Edge-cloud resource federation for sustainable cities

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103887

Keywords

Sustainability; Security; Cloud control matrix; Edge; IoT; Energy

Funding

  1. EU [504460]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research explores the application of a similar certification methodology to edge resources and how the CSA methodology would need to change to support this type of assessment, in order to enhance trust in the use of edge resources.
As cloud computing becomes the dominant mechanism for delivery of electronic services, significant recent effort has focused on certifying cloud services to ensure their compliance with security and privacy standards (such as GDPR). Assessing the benefit of using a particular cloud service, especially if such a service is being offered by providers that may be new to the cloud marketplace, remains a challenge. Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) provides a certification approach that associates a ranking to providers based on their capability assessment using a cloud control matrix. A provider can make a self-assessment, or an assessment can be undertaken by a third party. The intention is to increase user trust in a provider based on their rating using this methodology. This work investigates whether a similar certification methodology can be applied to edge resources, especially if these edge resources are combined with cloud services in a smart citiescontext. Can a CSA-like approach also be used to increase trust in use of edge resources? How would the CSA methodology need to change to support this type of assessment, and how useful is such an approach likely to be in practice? We propose a risk assessment methodology that can be used to address these concerns, and evaluate it in a practical application using both edge and cloud computing resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available