4.7 Article

Community decision-makers' choice of multi-objective scheduling strategy for integrated energy considering multiple uncertainties and demand response

Journal

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
Volume 83, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103945

Keywords

Multiple uncertainties; Probability box; Complex network; Comprehensive demand response; Community decision-makers; Muirhead mean operator

Funding

  1. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [9202017]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [72071076]
  3. National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences [19AGL027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multi-objective optimal scheduling model is proposed to address the impact of uncertainty on scheduling strategy in community integrated energy systems. The model incorporates a source-load uncertainty model and a comprehensive demand response model, and utilizes entropy weight method and Muirhead mean operator to determine the best strategy. The model has been validated using a multi-scene case and has shown effectiveness in reducing resident cost, carbon treatment amount, and improving energy supplier profit and renewable energy utilization rate.
To address the impact of uncertainty on scheduling strategy in community integrated energy systems, a multi-objective optimal scheduling model under the constraint of various uncertainties and demand response is suggested. Firstly, a source-load uncertainty model and a comprehensive demand response model are built. Secondly, construct a multi-objective satisfaction model and utility model based on the energy supplier profit, resident cost, carbon treatment amount, and renewable energy utilization rate. Then, the best strategy is determined using the entropy weight method and the Muirhead mean operator. Finally, a multi-scene case of a residential area is used to validate the model's effectiveness. The results show that: 1) The source-load uncertainty model improves overall robustness. 2) The resident cost is reduced by 7.59%-9.84%, the carbon treatment amount is reduced by 17.71%-95.635%, and the energy supplier profit and the renewable energy utilization rate are increased. 3) The strategy with the best satisfaction or the best utility may not be the best choice among the objective functions of different relationships, so decision-makers need to choose according to the actual situation. The model is beneficial to the economy and environment, and it serves as a guide for community decision-makers in selecting a comprehensive energy multi-objective scheduling strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available