4.6 Review

Discrepancy review: a feasibility study of a novel peer review intervention to reduce undisclosed discrepancies between registrations and publications

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Political Science

Pre-Analysis Plans: An Early Stocktaking

George K. Ofosu et al.

Summary: This study examines a sample of 195 PAPs and finds significant variation in their ability to achieve pre-registered goals. It highlights the need for strengthening norms and institutions to enhance the credibility of research.

PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Comparing dream to reality: an assessment of adherence of the first generation of preregistered studies

Aline Claesen et al.

Summary: The study found that while some preregistered studies in psychology followed the plan completely, many studies did not disclose deviations. Main deviations observed included sample size, exclusion criteria, and statistical analysis.

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2021)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Ben Goldacre et al.

TRIALS (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Update on Trial Registration 11 Years after the ICMJE Policy Was Established

Deborah A. Zarin et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2017)

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Use of Trial Register Information during the Peer Review Process

Sylvain Mathieu et al.

PLOS ONE (2013)