4.4 Article

Optimizing Hydraulic Retention Times in Denitrifying Woodchip Bioreactors Treating Recirculating Aquaculture System Wastewater

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 813-821

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0242

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tides Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia
  2. USDA Agriculture Research Service [59-1930-0-046]
  3. ARS [813669, ARS-0428109] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of wood-based denitrifying bioreactors to treat high-nitrate wastewaters from aquaculture systems has not previously been demonstrated. Four pilot-scale woodchip bioreactors (approximately 1: 10 scale) were constructed and operated for 268 d to determine the optimal range of design hydraulic retention times (HRTs) for nitrate removal. The bioreactors were operated under HRTs ranging from 6.6 to 55 h with influent nitrate concentrations generally between 20 and 80 mg NO3--N L-1. These combinations resulted in N removal rates >39 g N m(-3) d(-1), which is greater than previously reported. These high removal rates were due in large part to the relatively high chemical oxygen demand and warm temperature (similar to 19 degrees C) of the wastewater. An optimized design HRT may not be the same based on metrics of N removal rate versus N removal efficiency; longer HRTs demonstrated higher removal efficiencies, and shorter HRTs had higher removal rates. When nitrate influent concentrations were approximately 75 mg NO3-N L-1 (n = 6 sample events), the shortest HRT (12 h) had the lowest removal efficiency (45%) but a significantly greater removal rate than the two longest HRTs (42 and 55 h), which were N limited. Sulfate reduction was also observed under highly reduced conditions and was exacerbated under prolonged N-limited environments. Balancing the removal rate and removal efficiency for this water chemistry with a design HRT of approximately 24 h would result in a 65% removal efficiency and removal rates of at least 18 g N m(-3) d(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available