4.7 Article

Numerical modeling and experimental validation of the effect of arc distribution on the as-solidified Ti64 ingot in vacuum arc remelting (VAR) process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.036

Keywords

Numerical modeling; Axial magnetic field (AMF); Melt pool profile; Ti64 alloy ingot

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
  2. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a numerical model that couples electromagnetic field and plasma arc with multiphase transport phenomena for the vacuum arc remelting (VAR) process. 3D simulations were performed to investigate the effects of different arc distributions under an axial magnetic field (AMF) on the flow patterns and melt pool morphology during the VAR process of a Titanium-based alloy. The simulation results demonstrate that different arc distributions result in different melt pool shapes.
A numerical model coupling electromagnetic field and plasma arc impact with multiphase transport phenomena such as flow, heat transfer and solidification for the vacuum arc remelting (VAR) process is proposed. 3D simulations of the VAR process for refining a Titanium-based (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy are made. Different arc distributions (diffusive, constricted centric, constricted eccentric, and rotating arcs) under an axial magnetic field (AMF) are studied, focusing on their impact on the flow patterns and the resulting melt pool of the as-solidifying ingot. Simulation results show that diffusive arc leads to a shallow symmetrical melt pool; constricted centric and rotating arcs lead to electro-vortex flow and the symmetrical melt pool; constricted eccentric leads to electro-vortex flow as well, but the deepest non-symmetrical melt pool. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available