4.4 Article

Performance of Agricultural Residue Media in Laboratory Denitrifying Bioreactors at Low Temperatures

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 779-787

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2015.07.0407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AURI
  2. Minnesota Corn Research and Promotion Council
  3. USDA-ARS [59-1930-0-046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Denitrifying bioreactors can be effective for removing nitrate from agricultural tile drainage; however, questions about cold springtime performance persist. The objective of this study was to improve the nitrate removal rate (NRR) of denitrifying bioreactors at warm and cold temperatures using agriculturally derived media rather than wood chips (WC). Corn (Zea mays L.) cobs (CC), corn stover (CS), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) straw (BS), WC, and CC followed by a compartment of WC (CC+WC) were tested in laboratory columns for 5 mo at a 12-h hydraulic residence time in separate experiments at 15.5 and 1.5 degrees C. Nitrate-N removal rates ranged from 35 to 1.4 at 15.5 degrees C and from 7.4 to 1.6 g N m(-3) d(-1) at 1.5 degrees C, respectively; NRRs were ranked CC > CC+WC > BS = CS > WC and CC = CC+WC = CS = BS > WC for 15.5 and 1.5 degrees C, respectively. Although NRRs for CC were increased relative to WC, CC released greater amounts of carbon. Greater abundance of nitrous oxide (N2O) reductase gene (nosZ) was supported by crop residues than WC at 15.5 degrees C, and CS and BS supported greater abundance than WC at 1.5 degrees C. Production of N2O relative to nitrate removal (rN(2)O) was consistently greater at 1.5 degrees C (7.5% of nitrate removed) than at 15.5 degrees C (1.9%). The rN(2)O was lowest in CC (1.1%) and CC-WC (0.9%) and greatest in WC (9.7%). Using a compartment of agricultural residue media in series before wood chips has the potential to improve denitrifying bioreactor nitrate removal rates, but field-scale verification is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available