4.7 Article

A New Abnormal Node Detection Method With Dynamic Hoeffding Test

Journal

IEEE WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 1595-1599

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LWC.2022.3167827

Keywords

Packet loss; Relays; Monitoring; Probability distribution; Entropy; Convergence; Wireless networks; Wireless relay networks; abnormal node detection; Hoeffding test; asymptotic analysis

Funding

  1. Foundation of Stability Support Plan for National Key Laboratory [IFN2020106]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62176043, 62072077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this letter, a new method based on the dynamic Hoeffding test is proposed to distinguish abnormal relay nodes from those with normal packet loss in wireless communications. An asymptotic analysis of the detection performance on the Hoeffding test is conducted to determine a new dynamic detection threshold for reducing the probability of errors. Theoretical guarantees are provided, showing that both false alarm and missed detection probabilities of the proposed scheme exponentially converge as the number of detection periods increases. Simulation results validate the analysis and illustrate the superior detection performance of the proposed method.
In this letter, we propose a new method based on the dynamic Hoeffding test that can distinguish the abnormal relay nodes from those with normal packet loss in wireless communications. An asymptotic analysis of the detection performance on the Hoeffding test is conducted to determine the new dynamic detection threshold for decreasing the total probability of errors. With the theoretical guarantees, both false alarm and missed detection probabilities of the proposed scheme converge exponentially as the number of detection periods increases. Simulation results validate our analysis and demonstrate the superior detection performance of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available