4.6 Article

My Heart and My Brain Is What's Bleeding, These Are Just Cuts. An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Young Women's Experiences of Self-Harm

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.914109

Keywords

self-harm; interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA); stigma; qualitative; suicide

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding self-harm behavior from the perspective of those who engage in it is crucial for designing effective interventions and treatments. This research report focuses on a key theme, "Is Self-Harm Bad?", which explores how individuals both acknowledge and resist negative perceptions of self-harm created by others. The findings highlight the discrepancy between the characterization of self-harm as a highly risky behavior and the actual lived experience of self-harm as a functional means of emotion regulation. Emphasizing the risks may not be enough as a deterrent, and it is important to understand the underlying causes and meaning of self-harm to implement effective preventative interventions.
Engagement in self-harm, defined as intentional self-poisoning or self-injury irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act, is increasing, particularly among girls and young women. Understanding the behavior from the perspective of those who self-harm is, therefore, vital in designing effective interventions and treatments. The current brief research report presents a key theme from an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of the experience of self-harm among eight young women, aged between 18 and 29. The theme Is Self-Harm Bad? concerns the way in which participants both acknowledged and resisted a negative conception of self-harm that was often constructed from other people's attitudes. Three subthemes explore the reasons why participants were reluctant to endorse self-harm as bad: Self-Harm is the Symptom, Self-Harm Works (Until it Doesn't) and Self-Harm is Part of Me. The findings highlight the disparity between the characterization of self-harm as a highly risky behavior and the lived experience of self-harm as a functional means of emotion regulation. From a clinical perspective, the findings explored in this brief report suggest that highlighting the risks of self-harm may not be a sufficient deterrent. The recently revised draft National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends that everyone presenting to hospital following self-harm should be given a comprehensive psychosocial assessment, of which the function is, in part, to understand why the person has self-harmed. The current study underlines the importance of seeing past the behavior to the underlying causes and exploring the meaning of self-harm to the individual in order to implement effective preventative interventions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available