4.6 Article

GCNCMI: A Graph Convolutional Neural Network Approach for Predicting circRNA-miRNA Interactions

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.959701

Keywords

circRNA; miRNA; deep learning; graph convolution neural network; circRNA-miRNA interaction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [61972422]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a graph convolutional neural network-based approach named GCNCMI is proposed to predict the potential interactions between circRNAs and miRNAs. GCNCMI achieves the highest AUC and AUPR in the five-fold cross-validation experiment and shows good performance in case studies of two miRNAs.
The interactions between circular RNAs (circRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to alter gene expression and regulate genes on diseases. Since traditional experimental methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, most circRNA-miRNA interactions remain largely unknown. Developing computational approaches to large-scale explore the interactions between circRNAs and miRNAs can help bridge this gap. In this paper, we proposed a graph convolutional neural network-based approach named GCNCMI to predict the potential interactions between circRNAs and miRNAs. GCNCMI first mines the potential interactions of adjacent nodes in the graph convolutional neural network and then recursively propagates interaction information on the graph convolutional layers. Finally, it unites the embedded representations generated by each layer to make the final prediction. In the five-fold cross-validation, GCNCMI achieved the highest AUC of 0.9312 and the highest AUPR of 0.9412. In addition, the case studies of two miRNAs, hsa-miR-622 and hsa-miR-149-5p, showed that our model has a good effect on predicting circRNA-miRNA interactions. The code and data are available at https://github.com/csuhjhjhj/GCNCMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available