4.7 Article

Influence of COD/N ratio and carbon source on nitrogen removal in a structured-bed reactor subjected to recirculation and intermittent aeration (SBRRIA)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 519-524

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.054

Keywords

Anammox; COD/N ratio; Simultaneous nitrification denitrification; (SND); Structured-bed reactor subjected to; recirculation and intermittent aeration; (SBRRIA)

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo)
  2. CNPq [2009/15984-0, 2012-2/131343]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/15984-0] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of COD/N ratio and carbon source on simultaneous nitrogen and carbon removal processes. A continuous up-flow structured-bed reactor subjected to recirculation and intermittent aeration (SBRRIA) was operated with hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 11.2 +/- 0.6 h. The carbon sources were meat peptone and sucrose. The COD/N ratio varied by maintaining the organic loading rate fixed at 1.07 kg COD m(-3) d(-1) and changing the total-N concentration. The COD/N ratios tested were 9.7 +/- 1 (sucrose); 7.6 +/- 1 (meat peptone); 2.9 +/- 1 (meat peptone) and 2.9 +/- 0.4 (sucrose). COD removal efficiencies remained above 90% in all experimental phases. At lower COD/N ratios, NH4+-N oxidation efficiencies were higher than 90%. An autotrophic metabolism by anammox process was observed in Phases III and IV, which was responsible for 35% and 27% of total-N loading removal rates, respectively. Therefore, the system achieved total nitrogen removal efficiencies of 84.6 +/- 10.1 and 81.5 +/- 5.3%, under low availability of organic electron donors. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available