4.7 Article

Generating FAIR research data in experimental tribology

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-022-01429-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the lack of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data and metadata in experimental tribology and proposes a scalable framework for generating FAIR data. Through collaboration with developers, crowdsourcing controlled vocabulary, ontology building, and the use of digital tools, this paper demonstrates a collection of scalable non-intrusive techniques to improve the lifespan, reliability, and reusability of experimental tribological data.
Solutions for the generation of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data and metadata in experimental tribology are currently lacking. Nonetheless, FAIR data production is a promising path for implementing scalable data science techniques in tribology, which can lead to a deeper understanding of the phenomena that govern friction and wear. Missing community-wide data standards, and the reliance on custom workflows and equipment are some of the main challenges when it comes to adopting FAIR data practices. This paper, first, outlines a sample framework for scalable generation of FAIR data, and second, delivers a showcase FAIR data package for a pin-on-disk tribological experiment. The resulting curated data, consisting of 2,008 key-value pairs and 1,696 logical axioms, is the result of (1) the close collaboration with developers of a virtual research environment, (2) crowd-sourced controlled vocabulary, (3) ontology building, and (4) numerous - seemingly - small-scale digital tools. Thereby, this paper demonstrates a collection of scalable non-intrusive techniques that extend the life, reliability, and reusability of experimental tribological data beyond typical publication practices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available