4.7 Article

Experimental verification of a coherence factorization law for quantum states

Journal

PHOTONICS RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 2172-2177

Publisher

CHINESE LASER PRESS
DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.463829

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology [2021ZD0301400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11734015, 11774335, 11821404, 61725504, U19A2075]
  3. Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies [AHY020100, AHY060300]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2030380017]
  5. Open Funding Program from State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy (East China Normal University)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a coherence factorization law that describes the evolution of coherence passing through noisy channels characterized by genuinely incoherent operations. The law is experimentally verified using photons in qubits and qutrits. This work contributes to the understanding of coherence evolution in the presence of environmental interactions and promotes the study of more general laws of coherence.
As a quantum resource, quantum coherence plays an important role in modern physics. Many coherence measures and their relations with entanglement have been proposed, and the dynamics of entanglement has been experimentally studied. However, the knowledge of general results for coherence dynamics in open systems is limited. Here we propose a coherence factorization law that describes the evolution of coherence passing through any noisy channels characterized by genuinely incoherent operations. We use photons to implement the quantum operations and experimentally verify the law for qubits and qutrits. Our work is a step toward understanding of the evolution of coherence when the system interacts with the environment, and will boost the study of more general laws of coherence. (c) 2022 Chinese Laser Press

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available