4.5 Review

HIV, chemsex, and the need for harm-reduction interventions to support gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men

Journal

LANCET HIV
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages E717-E725

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00124-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology
  2. [108-2636-B-006-004]
  3. [109-2636-B-006-004]
  4. [110-2636-B-006-011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Numerous studies have found an association between the use of drugs in sexual contexts and HIV among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM). The relationship between chemsex, HIV treatment and prevention, harm reduction, and community health services is complex. In addition to HIV, there are potential harms such as intoxication and overdose. The review calls for greater understanding of chemsex within different GBMSM subpopulations and the development of tailored harm reduction models.
Numerous studies have identified an association between the use of drugs in sexual contexts (chemsex) and HIV among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), although whether a causal relationship exists is contentious. An intricate relationship exists between chemsex, HIV treatment and prevention, harm reduction, and the provision of community-grounded health services. Furthermore, potential harms exist beyond HIV, such as intoxication and overdose. Community-engaged responses to chemsex involve social and cultural strategies of harm reduction and sexual health promotion before, during, and after a chemsex session. Ultimately, this Review calls for actions and collaborations aimed at developing a greater understanding of chemsex as a practice within different GBMSM subpopulations and to develop tailored harm-reduction models that can accommodate GBMSM who engage in chemsex in various ways and with varied effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available