4.7 Article

Removal of sulfamethazine antibiotics using Ce-Fe-graphene nanocomposite as catalyst by Fenton-like process

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 182, Issue -, Pages 284-291

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.088

Keywords

Antibiotics; Fenton-like process; Graphene; Nanocomposite; Sulfamethazine

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51338005]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT-13026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of sulfonamide (SMT) antibiotics in aquatic environments has received increasing attention in recent years, and they are ubiquitous pollutants which cannot be effectively removed by conventional wastewater treatment processes. In this paper, the nanocomposites Ce-0/Fe-0-reduced graphene oxide (Ce-0/Fe-0-RGO) were synthesized through chemical reduction method, and characterized by Raman and FTIR before and after use. The addition of RGO can prevent the agglomeration of Ce-0 and Fe-0. The elimination of SMT can be divided into adsorption and degradation process. The adsorption of SMT onto the catalyst can enhance its degradation. The effect of pH value, concentration of H2O2, catalyst dosage, temperature and initial SMT concentration on the removal efficiency of SMT was determined. When pH = 7, T = 25 degrees C, H2O2 = 8 mM, Ce-0/Fe-0-RGO = 0.5 g/L, SMT = 20 mg/L, the removal efficiency of SMT and TOC was 99% and 73%, respectively. The stability of the catalysts was evaluated with repeated batch experiments using ethanol, water and acid as solvents to wash the used catalysts, respectively. The surface change of the catalysts after each use was characterized by Raman and FTIR analysis. The intermediates were detected by GC-MS and IC, the possible degradation pathway of SMT was tentatively proposed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available