4.5 Article

Improving the Robustness of Human-Machine Interactive Control for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand During Arm Position Changing

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROROBOTICS
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.853773

Keywords

gesture recognition; arm movement; EMG-FMG control; post-processing; robustness

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1913207]
  2. Fund from Science, Technology, and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [2021Szvup090]
  3. Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a framework for robust hand grasp type classification during dynamic arm position changes by improving both the hardware and algorithm components. Experimental results showed that the classification accuracy of multi-modal EMG-FMG signals was increased by more than 10% compared with the EMG-only signal, and the proposed sequential decision algorithm improved the accuracy by more than 4% compared with other baseline models when using both EMG and FMG signals.
Robust classification of natural hand grasp type based on electromyography (EMG) still has some shortcomings in the practical prosthetic hand control, owing to the influence of dynamic arm position changing during hand actions. This study provided a framework for robust hand grasp type classification during dynamic arm position changes, improving both the hardware and algorithm components. In the hardware aspect, co-located synchronous EMG and force myography (FMG) signals are adopted as the multi-modal strategy. In the algorithm aspect, a sequential decision algorithm is proposed by combining the RNN-based deep learning model with a knowledge-based post-processing model. Experimental results showed that the classification accuracy of multi-modal EMG-FMG signals was increased by more than 10% compared with the EMG-only signal. Moreover, the classification accuracy of the proposed sequential decision algorithm improved the accuracy by more than 4% compared with other baseline models when using both EMG and FMG signals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available