4.3 Review

Urine biomarkers of pulmonary tuberculosis

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 615-621

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2022.2090341

Keywords

Urine biomarkers; tuberculosis diagnostic; treatment efficiency predictors; spectrometry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI61019X0020, 075-15-2019-006]
  2. European Union Horizon 2020 program [825673]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review examines non-sputum diagnostic approaches for pulmonary tuberculosis based on urine samples, focusing on urine biomarkers. The analytical methods and designs vary among the studies, and only a few studies describe formal specificity and sensitivity analysis for diagnostic outcome prediction. Combining host and pathogen biomarkers may improve the sensitivity and specificity of tuberculosis diagnosis in the future.
Introduction Sputum-based tuberculosis diagnosis does not address the needs of certain categories of patients. Active development of a noninvasive urine-based diagnosis could provide an alternative approach. We reviewed publications covering more than 30 urine biomarkers proposed as significant for TB diagnosis. Analytical approaches were heterogeneous in design and methods; few studies on diagnostic outcome prediction described a formal specificity and sensitivity analysis. Areas covered This review describes studies of non-sputum diagnostic approaches of pulmonary TB based on urine using specific TB biomarkers. The search was performed until December 2021, using terms [Tuberculosis] + [urine] + [biomarkers] in PubMed and Cochrane databases. Publications concerning LAM urine diagnostics were excluded as they have been described elsewhere. Expert opinion Microbiological culture of sputum is considered to be the 'gold standard' diagnostic for pulmonary TB but the methodology is slow due to the slow growth of the TB bacteria. Urine provides a large volume of sample. Investigators have evaluated urine for either TB pathogen biomarkers or host biomarkers with some success as the review demonstrates. Detection sensitivity remains a significant problem. In future, combination of host and pathogen biomarkers could increase the sensitivity and specificity of TB diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available