4.6 Article

A proof of concept to define the parameters affecting poly-L-lactide-co-poly-ε-caprolactone shape memory electrospun nanofibers for biomedical applications

Journal

DRUG DELIVERY AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 593-607

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-022-01218-2

Keywords

Shape memory polymer; Electrospinning; Nanofibers; Design of experiment; Poly-L-lactide-co-poly-epsilon-caprolactone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the process parameters affecting the shape memory effect of copolymer nanofibrous scaffolds. A statistical approach is used to define the interaction between material and process variables and their influence on the ability of the scaffold to maintain and recover its shape. The results are validated through various characterization tests.
This study is a proof of concept performed to evaluate process parameters affecting shape memory effect of copolymer poly-L-lactide-co-poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PLA:PCL) 70:30 ratio based nanofibrous scaffolds. A design of experiment (DOE) statistical approach was used to define the interaction between independent material and process variables related to electrospun scaffold manufacturing, such as polymer solution concentration (w/v%), spinning time (min), and needle size (Gauge), and their influence on Rf% (ability of the scaffold to maintain the induced temporary shape) and Rr% (ability of the scaffold to recover its original shape) outputs. A mathematical model was obtained from DOE useful to predict scaffold Rf% and Rr% values. PLA-PCL 15% w/v, 22G needle, and 20-min spinning time were selected to confirm the data obtained from theoretical model. Subsequent morphological (SEM), chemical-physical (GPC and DSC), mechanical (uniaxial tensile tests), and biological (cell viability and adhesion) characterizations were performed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available