4.6 Article

Improvement of the Geometric Accuracy for Microstructures by Projection Stereolithography Additive Manufacturing

Journal

CRYSTALS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12060819

Keywords

projection stereolithography; geometric accuracy; 3D printing

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Sichuan University) [20822041F4049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a compensation method based on structure optimization to improve the geometric accuracy of projection stereolithography 3D printing for microstructures. The performance of the method is verified through simulation and experiments, showing significant improvements in shape and dimension accuracy.
Projection stereolithography creates 3D structures by projecting patterns onto the surface of a photosensitive material layer by layer. Benefiting from high efficiency and resolution, projection stereolithography 3D printing has been widely used to fabricate microstructures. To improve the geometric accuracy of projection stereolithography 3D printing for microstructures, a compensation method based on structure optimization is proposed according to mathematical analysis and simulation tests. The performance of the proposed compensation method is verified both by the simulation and the 3D printing experiments. The results indicate that the proposed compensation method is able to significantly improve the shape accuracy and reduce the error of the feature size. The proposed compensation method is also proved to improve the dimension accuracy by 21.7%, 16.5% and 19.6% for the circular, square and triangular bosses respectively. While the improvements on the dimension accuracy by 16%, 17.6% and 13.8% for the circular, square and triangular holes are achieved with the proposed compensation method. This work is expected to provide a method to improve the geometric accuracy for 3D printing microstructures by projection stereolithography.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available